Ratings for writer goodwriters
 |
Real name Username |
Susan C. goodwriters |
Would you like to ask this writer a question?  |
Would you like to have your article written by this writer?  |
| Overall rating |  | |||
Rated with
by josip 2012-07-27thanks
Rated with
by kymobilemedia 2012-07-26Good Job. Thanks
Rated with
by chachak 2012-07-26I did not see major rewriting.
Rated with
by webular 2012-07-25Rated with
by adrimontanari 2012-07-25Good article. Thank you
Rated with
by greggsobek 2012-07-25Well written. The article seemed original, is easily readable, and covered the topic well.
Rated with
by paulgold 2012-07-24Thorough research and attention to detail have made this a very acceptable article on the requested subject.
Rated with
by JoeC21 2012-07-21Hard to make any sense of and not really the laid back fun type of article i was looking for.
Rated with
by Julieann1 2012-07-20good, keep it up
Rated with
by zkyclear 2012-07-19I'm sorry, it's not what I expect
Rated with
by localfocal 2012-07-19The article does not contain the directed keywords and appears to be robot written non sensense.
Rated with
by drnuzum 2012-07-18Thanks
Rated with
by topmentor1 2012-07-18poor syntax doesnt read well. reads like synonym replaced spun content.
Rated with
by nvickery 2012-07-18Very poor English
Rated with
by nvickery 2012-07-18Rated with
by Wizzer 2012-07-17Many thanks, good article
Rated with
by vctexas 2012-07-17too many errors
Rated with
by josip 2012-07-16sorry but some of the content is repetitive
Rated with
by cjernigan 2012-07-13Rated with
by martyone 2012-07-12Thank you
Rated with
by elaine.mesina 2012-07-12This article needs to be edited at a rate of 75%. I don't have the time to do such edit.
Rated with
by nichemarkettools 2012-07-11Rated with
by cdubu1 2012-07-11great thanks
Rated with
by dsgehl 2012-07-10thank you for the article.
Rated with
by rjunior 2012-07-06did not specify 5 reasons... just mumbled on...
