Ratings for writer iqbal1
 |
Real name Username |
iqbal norvex iqbal1 |
Would you like to ask this writer a question?  |
Would you like to have your article written by this writer?  |
| Overall rating |  | |||
Rated with
by paultim71 2012-04-07 for Article: Steps of Getting a Glowing Skindidn't follow instructions
Rated with
by thansed 2012-04-06 for Article: Airport Check-insNot on topic. Use the link as a reference. Also awkward style.
Rated with
by leeroy1981 2012-04-06 for Article: The World of Yankee CandlesRated with
by cdubu1 2012-04-05 for Article: Cotton Pyjamas-the most relaxing clothinggreat thanks
Rated with
by mundana 2012-03-10 for Article: (your keyword is getting caught by Copyscape so i cant write it please you write it your self.}Rated with
by drumminlogan 2012-03-09 for Article: Offshore financial servicesRated with
by TedVarick 2012-02-28 for Article: Volume Conversion Volume ConversionPlease try and improve a bit as quite like it but struggled with readability a bit.
Rated with
by nico7980 2012-02-27 for Article: Heritage Electric GuitarsRated with
by cesar.yegres 2012-02-27 for Article: Rental Properties – Benefits and Risks!I don't consider it has a proffesional tone as I requested.
Rated with
by Bearuk26 2012-02-25 for Article: Abdominal MachinesWanted a article about abdominal machines alone the other key words not relating to abdominal machines were for the other articles I requested
Rated with
by ronnyg43 2012-02-25This will not be of interest to any golfer that has any basic knowledge knowledge of golf..
Rated with
by checkmate0 2012-02-24Rated with
by checkmate0 2012-02-24Rated with
by DieselViper 2012-02-24Very Bad Grammar...
Rated with
by Julieann1 2012-02-24Rated with
by jstand 2012-02-23okay, but not very readable and clearly not a native english speaker
Rated with
by yokozuna 2012-02-23bad readability
Rated with
by matsmaatson 2012-02-23+++++
Rated with
by highnettraffic 2012-02-23Article was not written in professional tone as requested. There are also many grammatical mistakes.
Rated with
by Vastidious 2012-02-22Rated with
by matsmaatson 2012-02-22Some grammer and spelling errors but beside that a good article.
Rated with
by joelwong622 2012-02-21Thanks
Rated with
by camoreno 2012-02-21This article would have to be rewritten because the use of the English language is not correct in the U.S.
Rated with
by embstats 2012-02-18I can read and understand the article just fine, however it is not in perfect English and that is what I need for my site. Sorry.
Rated with
by fenixsz 2012-02-18A lot of grammatical errors and there are no paragraphs at all.
Go to page: 1, 2
