Ratings for writer maggie pro
 |
Real name Username |
maggie pro |
This account has been discontinued |
|
| Overall rating |  | |||
Rated with
by benny18 2012-04-22Rated with
by joelwong622 2012-04-18not focus on topic
Rated with
by joelwong622 2012-04-17Rated with
by user2050 2012-04-11The article reads well but the author tends to repeat. The last 2 paragraphs are not related. Missing title.
Rated with
by aleex4 2012-04-10Rated with
by leedobbins 2012-04-10Rated with
by impulsa43 2012-04-10Great Job Thank You
Rated with
by trybpo 2012-04-06good
Rated with
by KristinZC 2012-04-05incorrect grammar.
Responded with comment: useless
Rated with
by dsteam 2012-04-05not good enough
Responded with comment: useless scammer
Rated with
by dsteam 2012-04-05sorry, not good enough for this one
Rated with
by dsteam 2012-04-05Rated with
by dsteam 2012-04-05Rated with
by joelwong622 2012-04-04Rated with
by dsteam 2012-04-04great
Rated with
by ezinedata05 2012-04-04This article been wrote by other writer. Thanks
Responded with comment: why reject this fine article?
Rated with
by leeroy1981 2012-04-04Rated with
by ramilmorla 2012-04-02Sorry, but you didn't respond to my request to make changes to the article so that I could approve it. Thank you.
Rated with
by usville 2012-04-02This article was specifically written about "wireless" broadband internet, which is not what we were looking for.
Rated with
by payton 2012-04-02Sorry but the first 2 paragraphs were not related and just wasted word count
Rated with
by olelar 2012-04-01Format properly and resubmit
Rated with
by petersmatthew 2012-03-31Rated with
by goransonr@bellsouth.net 2012-03-31Rated with
by brianzeng 2012-03-31poor typeset
Rated with
by ilainie 2012-03-31Thank you. Really. Thank you.
