Ratings for writer fmuchoki

Real name
Username
filex muchoki
fmuchoki
This account has been discontinued
Overall rating

Rated with 
  by devilmanb 2012-05-27 for Article: The features of the Sony Bravia KDL32BX330
 

Rated with 
  by paultim71 2012-05-24 for Article: Samsung EC -PL120 Review
 

Rated with 
  by allmang 2012-05-14 for Article: Professional beauty insurance
v good 

Rated with 
  by andrew777 2012-05-14 for Article: Where to get the latest suits for men 2012
thanks 

Rated with 
  by muzzy4u2 2012-05-11 for Article: Why government seized cars is an option for many
its ok but not professional 

Rated with 
  by mcydave 2012-05-02 for Article: Let your house furnished by the standard furniture company
Bad English 

Rated with 
  by darkvivi 2012-05-02 for Article: With locksmith Minneapolis all your problems solved
Excellent writer 

Rated with 
  by ronbarnas 2012-05-01 for Article: Natural weight loss vs weight loss pills
Very nice article Thanks! 5 star rating all the way 

Rated with 
  by tomoron 2012-05-01 for Article: Reasons why you should choose Kansas City Movers
I asked the article to be written with a direct approach to customer. An article that speaks direcly as the company to the customer. 
Responded with comment: your rating so bad scammer, that's selfish of you, shameful  

Rated with 
  by asacajiu 2012-04-30 for Article: The coolest way to re-invent your fashion business
Poor grammar, weird use of adjectives sounds spun. 
Responded with comment: You are fake requester,the kind that manually copy articles from iwriter, spoiling my rating you SCAMMER, all in the name of poor grammar or spun ? YOU ARE A SHAME TO the IWRITER COMMUNITY" go away if you are broke 

Rated with 
  by tresamore 2012-04-29
Great article; flows well, on topic, and not full of fluff. Thank you! 

Rated with 
  by longleyr 2012-04-28
need to work on your English a bit 

Rated with 
  by Seosally 2012-04-25
Very GOod THank you 

Rated with 
  by ewoauseo 2012-04-23
 

Rated with 
  by larryk 2012-04-22
article was okay, but wasn't what I was looking for. thanks though. 

Rated with 
  by rncaba 2012-04-21
Great article. Thanks! 

Rated with 
  by creativerty 2012-04-21
OK but parts do not read well, and keyword density required has not been delivered. 

Rated with 
  by grubner1 2012-04-20
 

Rated with 
  by castor 2012-04-19
Great work, well written article! 

Rated with 
  by ashokeseth 2012-04-19
badly written 
Responded with comment: scammer , no wonder you are broke 

Rated with 
  by cjernigan 2012-04-18
This is pitiful. Waste of time. 
Responded with comment: no worries, cheap requester 

Rated with 
  by cjernigan 2012-04-18
Did not follow directions. Don't turn something in that is such mess. You waste everyone's time jerk. 
Responded with comment: whats up? 

Rated with 
  by abbiemason 2012-04-18
 

Rated with 
  by pawelkalkus 2012-04-17
too many grammar mistakes 

Rated with 
  by Julieann1 2012-04-15
 

Show per page: 10 25 50
Go to page: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
 

Copyright 2011-2014 iWriter.com