Ratings for writer fmuchoki
 |
Real name Username |
fmuchoki |
This account has been discontinued |
|
| Overall rating |  | |||
Rated with
by devilmanb 2012-05-27 for Article: The features of the Sony Bravia KDL32BX330Rated with
by paultim71 2012-05-24 for Article: Samsung EC -PL120 ReviewRated with
by allmang 2012-05-14 for Article: Professional beauty insurancev good
Rated with
by andrew777 2012-05-14 for Article: Where to get the latest suits for men 2012thanks
Rated with
by muzzy4u2 2012-05-11 for Article: Why government seized cars is an option for manyits ok but not professional
Rated with
by mcydave 2012-05-02 for Article: Let your house furnished by the standard furniture companyBad English
Rated with
by darkvivi 2012-05-02 for Article: With locksmith Minneapolis all your problems solvedExcellent writer
Rated with
by ronbarnas 2012-05-01 for Article: Natural weight loss vs weight loss pillsVery nice article Thanks! 5 star rating all the way
Rated with
by tomoron 2012-05-01 for Article: Reasons why you should choose Kansas City MoversI asked the article to be written with a direct approach to customer. An article that speaks direcly as the company to the customer.
Responded with comment: your rating so bad scammer, that's selfish of you, shameful
Rated with
by asacajiu 2012-04-30 for Article: The coolest way to re-invent your fashion businessPoor grammar, weird use of adjectives sounds spun.
Responded with comment: You are fake requester,the kind that manually copy articles from iwriter, spoiling my rating you SCAMMER, all in the name of poor grammar or spun ? YOU ARE A SHAME TO the IWRITER COMMUNITY" go away if you are broke
Rated with
by tresamore 2012-04-29Great article; flows well, on topic, and not full of fluff. Thank you!
Rated with
by longleyr 2012-04-28need to work on your English a bit
Rated with
by Seosally 2012-04-25Very GOod THank you
Rated with
by ewoauseo 2012-04-23Rated with
by larryk 2012-04-22article was okay, but wasn't what I was looking for. thanks though.
Rated with
by rncaba 2012-04-21Great article. Thanks!
Rated with
by creativerty 2012-04-21OK but parts do not read well, and keyword density required has not been delivered.
Rated with
by grubner1 2012-04-20Rated with
by castor 2012-04-19Great work, well written article!
Rated with
by ashokeseth 2012-04-19badly written
Responded with comment: scammer , no wonder you are broke
Rated with
by cjernigan 2012-04-18This is pitiful. Waste of time.
Responded with comment: no worries, cheap requester
Rated with
by cjernigan 2012-04-18Did not follow directions. Don't turn something in that is such mess. You waste everyone's time jerk.
Responded with comment: whats up?
Rated with
by abbiemason 2012-04-18Rated with
by pawelkalkus 2012-04-17too many grammar mistakes
Rated with
by Julieann1 2012-04-15