Rated with
by
Zsozso 2012-05-17
Not a well-written article, doesn't flow well and contains grammatical errors. I'm sorry but I cannot approve that.
Excellent! 5 stars!
Rated with
by
HitenA 2012-05-16
Just a few mistakes but overall a well written article. Thanks.
contain html i asked not to include html
thanks
So sorry for the delay
This article is just ok and it does not have 2% keyword density.
Responded with comment: I THINK YOU`VE LOST YOUR WAY, THIS IS NOT THE BEST SITE FOR YOU! YOU ARE NOTHING BUT A AN ABSOLUTE TIME-WASTER AND A PATHETIC CLIENT!
Fantastic article!
Did a wonderful re-write... capturing the tone and nailing the subject matter.
Rated with
by
hfoord 2012-05-10
thanks
Thanks again
Rated with
by
zrockk 2012-05-02
Thank you for a fine job
There where a bit of grammatical errors on the article maybe just a typo error but the overall quality of the article was good. Though I would suggest the writer thoroughly read the article before submitting .
Excellent. Well written!
Lacks information. I want an article focused on the treatment.
You didn't follow instructions on the keyword. The density is 0%. Also, where are my H1 and H2 tags?
Excellent job!!
Go to page:
1,
2,
3,
4,
5,
6