Ratings for writer nithyaanjanaa
 |
Real name Username |
Nithya Anjanaa nithyaanjanaa |
Would you like to ask this writer a question?  |
Would you like to have your article written by this writer?  |
| Overall rating |  | |||
Rated with
by jemnelson 2012-03-15 for Article: Although the article contains some good content I would have to spend some time rewriting it as it is clear that english is not the author's first language.
Rated with
by aphexdm 2012-03-14 for Article: The role of User Experience and User Centered Design in today's web designGood research, strange sentence structures.
Rated with
by joeybob 2012-03-12 for Article: How to make Computer AnimationThank You :)
Rated with
by onlinepubSEO 2012-03-09 for Article: Sleep ApneaExcellent writer. i hope that this writer takes some of the other jobs that i have posted here. Thank you.
Rated with
by onlinepubSEO 2012-03-09 for Article: Rapid Eye Movement disorder (REM)Excellent writer. Followed instructions exactly. I hope this writer takes more of the articles that I have posted.
Rated with
by aleex4 2012-03-07 for Article: Simple Network Management Protocol.same article 3 times, what are you doing ?
Rated with
by aleex4 2012-03-07 for Article: Simple Network Management ProtocolSame Article twice? iWriter - do you check for the duplicates on the website?
Rated with
by aleex4 2012-03-07 for Article: SNMPthanks
Rated with
by techguyty 2012-03-05 for Article: RSS, Really Simple SyndicationPost is well researched but the writing does not flow very well. It's difficult to understand due to some odd choices of words and organization.
Rated with
by resqnow 2012-03-01 for Article: Commercial off the Shelf SoftwareRated with
by TedVarick 2012-02-29Would have still liked to have seen a few more improvements but not too much trouble to polish this article a little myself. Thanks for resubmitting.
Rated with
by ciaranedge 2012-02-28Well done but not what i am looking for
Rated with
by TedVarick 2012-02-28Needs some reworking as reading flow is not all that good with some seemingly odd word choices and strange sentances here and there.
Rated with
by peter7779 2012-02-25Some grammatical errors. Some sentences don't read well, points given are not specific enough.
