Ratings for writer anagha_709
 |
Real name Username |
Lata Vijaya Raghavan anagha_709 |
Would you like to ask this writer a question?  |
Would you like to have your article written by this writer?  |
| Overall rating |  | |||
| I have been doing freelance writing and rewriting for the last four plus years on the internet. Being a post graduate in English, and having worked in a nationalized bank for close to 18 years as a PA to top executives, I have a natural flair for good writing. Try me out for yourself! | ||||
Rated with
by LarryTay 2012-08-17Acceptable but some of the sentences have a word or two left out to make the thought complete.
I think you could do better if you would take time to really understand the message in the article rather than just trying to reword the thoughts.
I think you could do better if you would take time to really understand the message in the article rather than just trying to reword the thoughts.
Rated with
by kicker88 2012-08-165 stars.., thank you
Rated with
by brad896 2012-08-16Rated with
by bjarne 2012-08-14Rated with
by bjarne 2012-08-14Rated with
by bjarne 2012-08-13Rated with
by bjarne 2012-08-13Rated with
by masterimak 2012-08-13I don't need you to write them as a whole. I told you to rewrite them in past tense with no active voice. I just need them to be converted that way. I don't need you to rewrite them word per word.
Responded with comment: You have mentioned not to write in passive voice. I agree with past tense part. Give me another chance.
Rated with
by constant1 2012-08-11thanks
Rated with
by sjmcqueen 2012-08-08Nice article.
Thanks
Thanks
Rated with
by bjarne 2012-08-06Rated with
by rmahon 2012-08-05lack of communication. she just does not understand what I seeing.
Rated with
by zertopser 2012-08-04good, but not enough for a homepage
Rated with
by gmk1984 2012-08-04Rated with
by davidbilbrough 2012-08-02Rated with
by vgonsalv 2012-08-02Rated with
by cosmic 2012-08-02Responded with comment: What was wrong with my article? You should have assigned a reason for rejection.
Rated with
by bjarne 2012-08-01Great work!
Rated with
by LarryTay 2012-08-01Rated with
by slleknaes 2012-07-31Nice article. Thank you!
Rated with
by bjarne 2012-07-24Rated with
by bjarne 2012-07-24Rated with
by bjarne 2012-07-23Rated with
by shanezoom 2012-07-20The flow wasn't there. There were sentences where i had to go back and read again to get a clearer understanding. I'm sorry but i have to reject this.
Rated with
by nsadams76 2012-07-19