Ratings for writer anagha_709
 |
Real name Username |
Lata Vijaya Raghavan anagha_709 |
Would you like to ask this writer a question?  |
Would you like to have your article written by this writer?  |
| Overall rating |  | |||
| I have been doing freelance writing and rewriting for the last four plus years on the internet. Being a post graduate in English, and having worked in a nationalized bank for close to 18 years as a PA to top executives, I have a natural flair for good writing. Try me out for yourself! | ||||
Rated with
by Haboub 2012-07-19Rated with
by bjarne 2012-07-19Rated with
by roughan 2012-07-18I'm sorry to have to reject, but article is full of grammatical errors and does not flow well.
Responded with comment: It's really sad that you spend hours writing a 1000 word article and it gets rejected. You should mention where I went wrong with proper explanation.
Rated with
by fretfury 2012-07-18It talks about me working as a secretary which is not what I was after. I wanted a general explanation about the laws of attraction and gave a link to an article I liked, I'm not after a personal story
Responded with comment: I get it now. Give me another chance. I can turn out a better article. Sorry.
Rated with
by josip 2012-07-17Rated with
by Haboub 2012-07-17Rated with
by checkmate0 2012-07-16Rated with
by wesleyr 2012-07-16Good article, thank you
Rated with
by honeyreidy 2012-07-16article well written...thanks
Rated with
by botipton 2012-07-15Very well written will be back for more. Adding this author to my favorites.
Rated with
by thearticlepress 2012-07-14English is a little off.
Rated with
by jigsaw 2012-07-13Rated with
by dmswans 2012-07-13Instructions requested 2 articles
Responded with comment: Your instructions weren't clear. You should have been more specific.
Rated with
by carl55 2012-07-12Very nice Article. Would use this Writer again.
Rated with
by heatherene 2012-07-08Rated with
by josip 2012-07-06Rated with
by ctuck26 2012-06-30There are quite a few errors in the articles, and the wording is quite awkward in many places.
Rated with
by intl_e 2012-06-29On point. Thanks a lot.
Rated with
by josip 2012-06-29Rated with
by jayestovall 2012-06-28This article is good. There are certain words when speaking about this topic must be retained, however those words were exchanged by a synonym, which actually changed the meaning. I can fix those. Overall, this is a good rewrite.
Rated with
by alancarrr1 2012-06-25Sorry, not enough quality, mistakes and bad grammar. Not fluent English as requested.
Rated with
by myrw2012 2012-06-20Good, but some grammatical errors.
Rated with
by contneku 2012-06-19Rated with
by gundrit777 2012-06-08Great job
Rated with
by mothersill 2012-06-07This is a tough read! I don't understand &ndash - what is it?
