Ratings for writer grace2012
 |
Real name Username |
Nishidha Patil grace2012 |
Would you like to ask this writer a question?  |
Would you like to have your article written by this writer?  |
| Overall rating |  | |||
| Hi All, I am a freelancer writer, freelancer photographer, website designer and a journalist since last 3 years. I own online websites too. I had been interested in content writing because I am the admin of the website where content writing is SEO based and involves certain keywords to be a part of the article as well as the content writing. My hobbies include writing and photography which have been turned into my profession. Rest I would say, Grace, Mercy and Peace be with you all forever. |
||||
Rated with
by hanif123 2013-01-07 for Article: Makar Sankranti - The Festival of Kites and Harvestfound problem while submitting ..
grammer mistakes
grammer mistakes
Rated with
by jmiklacic 2013-01-03 for Article: Top 5 Easy Ways To Earn Cash Onlinegood job
Rated with
by mark11 2013-01-03 for Article: Light Painting Tips for BeginnersRated with
by mark11 2013-01-02 for Article: How To Create Stunning Trick Photosgood article
Rated with
by mark11 2013-01-02 for Article: Important Considerations When Creating Light Painting Photosgood article! Thanks
Rated with
by mark11 2013-01-02 for Article: How To Create A Stunning Light Painting PhotoGood article!
Rated with
by mark11 2013-01-02 for Article: Top 5 Trick Photography ToolsRated with
by mark11 2013-01-02 for Article: Top 5 Expensive Trick Photography Toolsnice article!
Rated with
by mark11 2013-01-02 for Article: Top 5 Websites To buy Trick Photography ToolsRated with
by hanif123 2013-01-01 for Article: Send Hindi Love Shayari To Impress Your Beloved Onesnice man
Rated with
by hanif123 2013-01-01good work
Rated with
by mark11 2012-12-31thanks good article
Rated with
by mark11 2012-12-31nice article!
Rated with
by wolfweb 2012-12-30The grammer is not good. A lot of this article doesn't make sense.
Rated with
by mark11 2012-12-30Thank you! Good article, just a few grammar errors. Followed instructions well
Rated with
by keithstauffer 2012-05-26nice article
Rated with
by imurphy36 2012-05-25No exact I want, sorry.
Rated with
by mhagens 2012-05-25The article lacks substance. Some words are not appropriate.
Rated with
by tammymonster 2012-05-25improper English. I'm sorry.
Rated with
by nvickery 2012-05-24.......................
Rated with
by ewoauseo 2012-05-21not informative
Rated with
by monhas 2012-05-20Rated with
by websiteguy 2012-05-17Rated with
by Bastin 2012-05-17thank you
Rated with
by lindsayhogga 2012-05-04Incorrect sentence structure and word usage
Rated with
by SohailA 2012-05-02Well-written article. Good job!
Rated with
by Tigertrade 2012-04-30Rated with
by Tigertrade 2012-04-29Rated with
by Tigertrade 2012-04-29Rated with
by yardstick 2012-04-29not standard
Rated with
by robchapman 2012-04-29The article lacks a good direction. It is decent, but probably won't hold the reader's attention past the first couple of sentences. A better subject would have been "The Top Five SEO Tools for 2012" or something like that.
Rated with
by ishuvonet 2012-04-27Good
Rated with
by article inc 2012-04-25Your grammar was poor in this article, and the info felt rushed. Normally I reject articles that require a lot of editing. However, I accepted this article because it just so happened that your main points were solid. Thanks for the effort.
Rated with
by cosmic 2012-04-25Rated with
by skirklin 2012-04-24Great job! I love it.
Rated with
by yegonsk 2012-04-24Rated with
by yegonsk 2012-04-23Rated with
by khawaja1971 2012-04-23Needs additional proofreading.
Rated with
by yegonsk 2012-04-23Rated with
by yegonsk 2012-04-23Rated with
by blackcreek 2012-04-23Rated with
by khawaja1971 2012-04-23The first two paragraphs need to be re-written. Maybe the 3rd as well, then you can resubmit.
Rated with
by khawaja1971 2012-04-23This is a good base to start off with, but you need to improve some of the wording. Please do another round of proofreading, fix the minor issues and you can resubmit.
Rated with
by leswilson 2012-04-21Thanks. Good article.
Rated with
by Ariel74 2012-04-21The essence of a good article was there but it read as though it had been through an article spinner. It also makes claims I would need to be able to substantiate.
Rated with
by allentan 2012-04-21Nice article. Great Job.
Rated with
by akrtw1 2012-04-20good writer but can be better
Rated with
by Consult247 2012-04-20Grammar is poor and just as a whole the article is poor - would not like to put my name to it!
Rated with
by onefunsite 2012-04-20Rated with
by chardee42 2012-04-20Looks good; thanks!
