Rated with
by
alexrjr 2012-04-29 for
Article:
Quality SEO Services
Comment was removed by admin
Responded with comment: The company name was mentioned severally in the article. If you have to reject an article don't give false reasons, remember it helps when you say the truth.
Rated with
by
neuewavemedia 2012-04-26 for
Article:
SEO marketing services
does not read well in places
Rated with
by
ewoauseo 2012-04-26 for
Article:
The most popular Video hosting sites
Rated with
by
ewoauseo 2012-04-25 for
Article:
Affordable Android Tablets
What is that
Rated with
by
ezinedata05 2012-04-05 for
Article:
Wireless Routers
hard to understand and not in proper format.
Rated with
by
Fatmach 2012-04-04 for
Article:
HTML 5 features
Thanks you, I find there was a little fluff at the begging of the article but still made for a desent article
Rated with
by
oicgroup 2012-04-03 for
Article:
Is your E commerce website secure?
Rated with
by
allbiz 2012-04-02 for
Article:
Business websites
Thank you for a great article.
Rated with
by
valcho 2012-03-28 for
Article:
Common windows 7 loader issues
Good article, thanks
Poorly written, will need some fine tunning.
good article, thanks
Rated with
by
aleex4 2012-03-21
poor quality, repetitions
spelling of analyze is incorrect. Sorry.
Not written the way I want it. Sorry. Thanks.
Thank you for your effort, but your article is full of grammatical errors. In the time it would take for me to go through and correct all of your errors, I could rewrite the info myself. Perhaps next time!
Articles was just what I needed
Sentence construction is not apt
Excellent content and well written.
Thank You!
nice article and good details
some good content, but sentence structure was very difficult to read, several grammar errors, and even though i edit ad add to most articles, this one is too difficult to figure out. thank you for trying!