Ratings for writer amalia
 |
Real name Username |
Tahir BL amalia |
Would you like to ask this writer a question?  |
Would you like to have your article written by this writer?  |
| Overall rating |  | |||
Rated with
by lindsayhogga 2012-07-31 for Article: Wonderful benefits of life insuranceawkward wording
Rated with
by strategist 2012-07-31 for Article: Important seven tips for imroving your living room on a budgetSentence does not look natural
Rated with
by BizMax 2012-07-30 for Article: Importance of the question “do you know what item/ service is bringing you the highest ROI (Return on investment)?”Hard to follow, the sentences didn't flow well together.
Rated with
by ken8868 2012-07-30 for Article: How to find out a cleanser for dry skin and oily skin?good
Rated with
by ecomsolutions 2012-07-27 for Article: Wonderful advantages of commercial awningsPoor grammar
Rated with
by elaine.mesina 2012-06-04 for Article: Questions to be asked from a money lender SingaporeThis article is for SEO. I asked for the keyword to appear once every 100 words. You did not comply.
Rated with
by mccmarketing 2012-06-02 for Article: How to take care of hardwood flooring cleveland?overuse of keywords, not informative.
Rated with
by wjtyoung 2012-06-02 for Article: Las Vegas Real Estate - Property For Sale Las Vegas Important GuidelinesPoor grammar
Rated with
by wandytop 2012-05-31 for Article: Kinds of Las Vegas Air Conditioning RepairRated with
by drewthershooter 2012-05-30 for Article: Important project manager jobsSeems like key word was plugged into a basic template. No thanks
Rated with
by cpamarch3 2012-05-29There are typos and the sentence structure is very poor.
Rated with
by Chenzo21 2012-05-29deceiving star-rating. poor, awkward writing.
Rated with
by Chenzo21 2012-05-29Rated with
by texadero 2012-05-25Rated with
by christianluzon 2012-05-21I needed 400 word review.not 300 words. How can I give you a tip if you fail to meet the word count?!
Rated with
by dogmatic69 2012-05-17Rated with
by toorgeman 2012-05-17Rated with
by josip 2012-05-17Rated with
by texadero 2012-05-17Rated with
by leeroy1981 2012-05-17Rated with
by christianluzon 2012-05-16sorry but this is not what I expected you to write.. I need better quality
Rated with
by adiel130 2012-05-16I think you write well.
I'm glad you wrote the article under the structure I wanted.
Happy to continue working with you.
Thank you
I'm glad you wrote the article under the structure I wanted.
Happy to continue working with you.
Thank you
Rated with
by Hector.G89 2012-05-15Rated with
by tamara 2012-05-15Rated with
by shantanu says 2012-05-15too many subheadings, not promotional.
