Ratings for writer Steinley
 |
Real name Username |
Glenda Steinley Steinley |
Would you like to ask this writer a question?  |
Would you like to have your article written by this writer?  |
| Overall rating |  | |||
Rated with
by rstorrs 2011-11-09 for Article: Harman Pellet StovesAn informative and well written article. Thanks!
Rated with
by rstorrs 2011-11-06 for Article: Harman Pellet StovesThanks again for the great article!
Rated with
by MBtickets 2011-10-20 for Article: National Park The Home Of The Washington NationalsThanks for the re-write. Really appreciate all your hard work.
Rated with
by crespom 2011-10-18 for Article: E-mail Hostingused the keyword 'e-mail' far too many times but no grammatical errors was fine
Rated with
by MBtickets 2011-10-18 for Article: National Park Is Home For The Washington Nationals Sorry to reject an article, but could you remove the part about ticket prices and write about something else. This article is going an e-commerce site that has different ticket prices. We do not offer those deals on our site. Thank You.
Rated with
by MBtickets 2011-10-18 for Article: Rangers Ballpark In Arlington is Home To TheTexas Rangers Great researcher who has command of the subject before writing. Great work. I still found sentences I felt needed periods or punctuations (found run on sentences).
Rated with
by MBtickets 2011-10-18 for Article: Scottrade Center Home Of The St. Louis BluesThis was a content stuffed article (this was what we wanted). Although, you need to work on your sentences and punctuations. Way too many run on sentences and places I felt needed a period at the end. Overall, good work.
Rated with
by brainspike 2011-10-18 for Article: 3D Scanning ServiceRated with
by djparnell 2011-10-18 for Article: Hemroid CreamRated with
by rstorrs 2011-10-18 for Article: Best Wood StovesRated with
by AJQuinn 2011-10-18Good job, thank you.
Rated with
by AJQuinn 2011-10-18Good job, thank you.
Rated with
by gungho 2011-10-12Rated with
by gungho 2011-10-12Rated with
by gungho 2011-10-12Rated with
by gungho 2011-10-12Rated with
by superdevo 2011-10-12Good article.
Rated with
by MBtickets 2011-10-11Another great article with unique content. Careful when you transfer the article to iWriter. The spacing on the document got a little messed up.
Rated with
by MBtickets 2011-10-11Thanks for the great article. This writer is a great researcher and provides unique content.
Rated with
by brigyxy 2011-10-11Nice article, you did your research! Thanks!
Rated with
by drvn4eagles 2011-10-10Rated with
by gungho 2011-10-10Rated with
by gungho 2011-10-10Rated with
by gungho 2011-10-10Rated with
by drvn4eagles 2011-10-10just what i was looking for, excellent job
Rated with
by solidrockguy 2011-10-10Rated with
by lindaW3012 2011-10-10Rated with
by kmeyers1 2011-10-08Awsome thanks alot!!!!
Rated with
by billhelton 2011-10-07Another excellent article by Steinley...fantastic use of keywords once again!
Rated with
by MBtickets 2011-10-07A well written article. Very easy to read and understand. This person really knows how to write. Thank you!
Rated with
by rabbtux 2011-10-06Nice work. I only want to change 1 sentence before using it. Prompt response, thanks!
Rated with
by bobpardue 2011-10-06Great writing!
Rated with
by billhelton 2011-10-06Another great article...definitely the best writer I've used on this site. Beautiful use of keywords!
Rated with
by rstorrs 2011-10-06Thanks for the great article!
Rated with
by rstorrs 2011-10-06Great article! Thanks.
Rated with
by billhelton 2011-10-05Consistently the best writer on this site...I'd be happy if this writer took all of my article requests. Couldn't be happier!
Rated with
by gavenus 2011-10-05I received an acceptable article, reasonably written but nothing special.
Rated with
by anfield5 2011-10-05Fantastic writing, will definitely use again!
Rated with
by maranda 2011-10-05Great job, and thanks
Rated with
by BobOct3rd 2011-10-05The content of the article was good however there were grammatical errors.
Grammatical errors are easily correctable while correcting technical content is much more difficult and time comsuming.
Based on this I accepted the article.
Grammatical errors are easily correctable while correcting technical content is much more difficult and time comsuming.
Based on this I accepted the article.
Rated with
by BobOct3rd 2011-10-05Rated with
by dkelso 2011-10-05The article was acceptable but not the high quality we expected for the rating of the writer.
Rated with
by simonwade 2011-10-04wrote generally well according to the guidelines set
Rated with
by seattleinspector 2011-10-04Some sentences do not make sense. Was this a spin?
Rated with
by billhelton 2011-10-04Excellent article! The writer captured exactly what I was looking for---couldn't be happier!
Rated with
by bshahbazi 2011-10-04Rated with
by rstorrs 2011-10-03Great article, thanks!
Rated with
by thephoenix 2011-10-03Great article!
Rated with
by otavio81 2011-10-03Rated with
by westcoast 2011-10-03Great article. Thanks so much
Go to page: 1, 2
