Ratings for writer ngugisteve

Real name
Username
ngugi kamau
ngugisteve
This account has been discontinued
Overall rating

Rated with 
  by vicbas52 2012-04-17
completed by aeromovement 

Rated with 
  by zoombug 2012-04-16
This is badly written and 90% padding. 

Rated with 
  by isnogood 2012-04-16
There are some mistakes but the biggest problem is that you have written about the general topic and not the keyword. I would have expected to read about prices, cost reduction from wholesale purchases,sources, pros and cons, risks etc 

Rated with 
  by aproarticles 2012-04-16
Good job of this one! Looks great!Good job on use of keywords.  

Rated with 
  by rodder7 2012-04-16

















The article did discuss the coffeecup editor, but lacked tips for actually using it per the project request. If it can be written to include tips on actual usage of the html editor, it will be accepted.




Rated with 
  by influx87 2012-04-15
Looking for higher quality article, thanks. 

Rated with 
  by zelgly2 2012-04-15
Nice one 

Rated with 
  by stesnees 2012-04-14
Not good enough article flow and english language 

Rated with 
  by coby8740 2012-04-14
Decent article. 

Rated with 
  by paul empey 2012-04-14
 

Rated with 
  by magnolia 2012-04-14
A few typos, spelling errors and grammatical errors. It does not sound like it's written by a native English speaker as there are some strange phrases used. Will need a bit of rewriting. 

Rated with 
  by eharrold 2012-04-13
Grammar is clunky making the article difficult to follow for native US English readers - please run articles through a US English grammar checker and at least achieve a High School Graduate level. 

Rated with 
  by LJOnline 2012-04-13
I will need to make a little tweek here and there but loved the approach and use of keyword. 

Rated with 
  by paul empey 2012-04-13
 

Rated with 
  by aleex4 2012-04-12
 

Rated with 
  by rollingthunder 2012-04-12
thank you for the article... we are not looking for your style of writing at this time... but thank you again! 

Rated with 
  by LJOnline 2012-04-12
Follwoed te brief well and delivered wat I wanted. thanks 

Rated with 
  by aproarticles 2012-04-12
Good job!  

Rated with 
  by aproarticles 2012-04-11
This one didn't flow as well as I would have liked.  

Rated with 
  by aproarticles 2012-04-11
Although this one mentions apartment as well, it flows better and the apartment part can easily be edited.

Thanks! 

Rated with 
  by aproarticles 2012-04-11
The article focuses mainly on basement apartment finishing and it's for a full basement finish, not apartment. This one didn't flow very well.  

Rated with 
  by hskrdoo 2012-04-11
Super fast turnaround with great content! Great job! Followed my instructions to a tee and gave me exactly what I was looking for. 

Rated with 
  by NatashaTEAM 2012-04-11
 

Rated with 
  by Carloss 2012-04-10
too generic 

Rated with 
  by whjsales 2012-04-06
 

Show per page: 10 25 50
Go to page: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
 

Copyright 2011-2014 iWriter.com