Ratings for writer Nick Giacobe
 |
Real name Username |
Nick Giacobe giacobe |
Would you like to ask this writer a question?  |
Would you like to have your article written by this writer?  |
| Overall rating |  | |||
| Nick is a career computer networking professional with over 20 years of computer support experience. From network design, helpdesk, and computer security, Nick can handle writing a variety of computer and technology topics. Nick also has a variety of experience with health-related topics from kidney stones, to mental health to reproductive biology. He is an advocate of the informed consumer of healthcare. Information about conditions is available on the Internet, but often it is written in a form that is difficult for most people to understand. Nick has a clear writing style that communicates the important without overwhelming the reader. You need to hire Nick! |
||||
Rated with
by influx87 2012-02-19 for Article: Bunk bed mattress sizes, more than just twin.Great
Rated with
by Budget101 2012-02-19 for Article: Become a computer repair technician. It's a great home based businessRated with
by edenhpg 2012-02-19 for Article: Find the right faucet to match your new vessel sink!Rated with
by thab0ss 2012-02-19 for Article: Emergency Preparedness on a BudgetRated with
by bradleyslife 2012-02-16 for Article: Whiteboard and Dry Erase Markers Can Be Fun, Colorful and Eco-FriendlyAbsolutely Brilliant article! Love your work!
Rated with
by ventureonline 2012-02-14 for Article: Taking online surveys for money can be fun!Rated with
by Budget101 2012-02-12 for Article: Planning options for temporary emergency sheltersRated with
by Budget101 2012-02-11 for Article: Get organized with a family emergency evacuation planEXCELLENT, Well thought out, Well Written, Perfect Grammar, 10 Stars!
Rated with
by Budget101 2012-02-06 for Article: Fifteen Winter Family ActivitiesGreat :-)
Rated with
by kgarrett 2011-10-05 for Article: With a little preparation, registration of a domain name is a simple processNice work.
Rated with
by peter7779 2011-10-02not the type of content i'm looking for, sorry.
Responded with comment: This reviewer rejected my work, even though it was a suitable article for what was requested. His only comment was "not what I was looking for." Won't work for him again. He should have been more clear as to what he wanted in the first place.
Rated with
by tomc2011 2011-09-30Very good! Thanks.
Rated with
by dallasweb 2011-09-28Responded with comment: 24 hours until payment. Poor review on what was a good article with no feedback other than a score. While I'd like to do better for you, I have no idea what you want me to do differently.
Rated with
by cordonez7 2011-09-28very good, thank you.
Rated with
by markvs 2011-09-27Hey, I Iearned something from your article. Good job.
Rated with
by radox13 2011-09-24This is an Awesome article! Impressed!
Rated with
by firefly 2011-09-07Good stuff.. thanks!
Rated with
by firefly 2011-09-05