Ratings for writer viqueka
 |
Real name Username |
viqueka |
This account has been discontinued |
|
| Overall rating |  | |||
Rated with
by pickok1 2012-04-12 for Article: Several Styles of Chesterfield Sofasok
Rated with
by sbhall 2012-04-12 for Article: Cheap Memorabilia Bridal Shower FavorsPoorly written.
Rated with
by iSeochamp 2012-04-10 for Article: Trandy Foots and Luxurious Foot Wearsthank you
Rated with
by nadeemc 2012-04-10 for Article: The Best Way to Sell House Quickly and PrivatelyRated with
by brianzeng 2012-04-09 for Article: The Need For Customized Name Plates in a BusinessPoor quality
Rated with
by lee li 2012-04-07 for Article: The Best Ethics In eCommerce BusinessRated with
by iSeochamp 2012-04-07 for Article: Qualities of Good SEO Consultant in Your BusinessThank You
Rated with
by pvelinov 2012-04-07 for Article: Mobile Apps Lab Designed by the SAP PartnersIt wasn't what I wanted but still better than nothing.
Rated with
by annieooi 2012-04-07 for Article: Several Uses and Advantages of Plastic Shopping BagsPls refer ticket no. KRZ-827207 from your support team for further amendment.
Rated with
by bubsngrubs 2012-04-07 for Article: Get A Good Maxi Cosi Design From Bubs n GrubsRated with
by chalabtt 2012-04-06i wanted both advantages and disadvantages.
also, the article is one piece, please break it down into paragraphs next time
thanks
also, the article is one piece, please break it down into paragraphs next time
thanks
Responded with comment: thanks i will try to b more careful
Rated with
by chardee42 2012-03-17Reads like an encyclopedia, and doesn't make sense in several places. Too poorly written to fix. Sorry.
Rated with
by celticboy 2012-03-16Rated with
by bubsngrubs 2012-03-15Article not about the products we sell - please look at the link we give you in future to know the background on the product.
Rated with
by juneng 2012-03-14need more specific info. not general info on online shopping.
Rated with
by RR4111 2012-03-14Extremely poor English.
Responded with comment: dog
Rated with
by bubsngrubs 2012-03-14Rated with
by jpmedia 2012-03-13Horrible grammar. It doesn't make any sense. This is reject number 2!!!
Responded with comment: dog
Rated with
by sjmcqueen 2012-03-13This article is very confusing and it makes it difficult to understand.
Responded with comment: dog
Rated with
by faisalmaximus 2012-03-13Irrelevant sentences at the start.
Responded with comment: you fool why post such kind of an nonsence whereas you can write for yourself
Rated with
by lewvin 2012-03-13great thanks
Rated with
by humphca 2012-03-12Good Article thank you
Rated with
by lethallp 2012-03-12Good work
Rated with
by nlgordaz 2012-03-11