Ratings for writer leonardito
 |
Real name Username |
leonardito |
This account has been discontinued |
|
| Overall rating |  | |||
Rated with
by grabdavid 2012-07-16 for Article: great
Rated with
by James2Dylan 2012-07-15 for Article: Google sniper expirienceWell written review.
Rated with
by James2Dylan 2012-07-14 for Article: There is no title for this article. Need a good title. Article looked good but requires a title.
Rated with
by paulhollowayseo 2012-07-12 for Article: Rated with
by jurede 2012-07-11 for Article: cHow to make a relationship lastRated with
by NatashaTEAM 2012-07-11 for Article: cloud computingTo many mistakes
Rated with
by justin1 2012-07-10 for Article: A+++++++++ good quality delivered fast
Rated with
by damian 2012-07-09 for Article: Rated with
by NatashaTEAM 2012-07-09 for Article: Poor overall quality of the text
Rated with
by damian 2012-07-08 for Article: Rated with
by Purple Cow Communications 2012-07-06The use of English and grammar wasn't very good.
Rated with
by VitaRank 2012-07-06Rated with
by VitaRank 2012-07-06Rated with
by plrplace 2012-07-02Although the content of this article was good the English was very poor.
Rated with
by anirutpae 2012-07-02Not follow on my instruction
Rated with
by dedomraz 2012-07-01Nice job.
Rated with
by yihlong 2012-06-30Rated with
by KM4375 2012-06-26Rated with
by Purple Cow Communications 2012-06-25Followed instructions well.
Rated with
by pahlevir 2012-06-24Sorry I am not satisfied with you article
Rated with
by ritchie3 2012-06-18Good
Rated with
by fonic1 2012-06-16Very good content :)
Rated with
by JerryB 2012-06-16Great Article
Rated with
by jasonparker 2012-06-13Rated with
by informacione 2012-06-10this is not english
Responded with comment: pathetic
Rated with
by castor 2012-06-10Rated with
by 26weekplan 2012-06-09not that great I'm afraid
Rated with
by nadeemc 2012-06-09poor grammar in certain places, should of read through article prior to submission to make sure it makes sense.
Rated with
by leswilson 2012-06-09Article well thought out and written. Thanks.
Rated with
by mayateam 2012-06-08Rated with
by priyaflorence 2012-06-03Well-written. GOod effort. Thanks
Rated with
by pingable 2012-06-01The article is well written, and useful to me...so I will buy it...but a seedbox and Windows dedicated server are actually different things and you were meant to compare them. Still I can use this.
Rated with
by KristinZC 2012-06-01Very good, thank you!
Rated with
by jockster 2012-05-30spelling and grammer
Rated with
by jockster 2012-05-30poor spelling and grammer
Rated with
by NatashaTEAM 2012-05-28Rated with
by mrdofthejungle 2012-05-27Great job. Clear and concise writing. Well done.
Rated with
by stevekershaw 2012-05-26Good article
Rated with
by shikobaby 2012-04-21Rated with
by shikobaby 2012-04-21Rated with
by shikobaby 2012-04-21Rated with
by shikobaby 2012-04-21Rated with
by shikobaby 2012-04-21Rated with
by shikobaby 2012-04-21Rated with
by shikobaby 2012-04-21Rated with
by shikobaby 2012-04-21Rated with
by NatashaTEAM 2012-04-09Rated with
by recipe 2012-04-07good attempt, but needed more information about musical notes
Rated with
by 360hdmi 2012-04-06Great Job, I like you to do the Power Matrix HD+ Pack. And this time know more about the product.
Thanks,
Thanks,
Rated with
by mervarid 2012-04-05excellent
