Ratings for writer Danielwriter
 |
Real name Username |
Daniel Crawford Danielwriter |
Would you like to ask this writer a question?  |
Would you like to have your article written by this writer?  |
| Overall rating |  | |||
Rated with
by jgrigs711 2012-05-03 for Article: Shakeology ReviewGreat work as usual!
Rated with
by bt2007 2012-04-26 for Article: How to Make Your Own Beat with FL StudioAwesome article. thanks
Rated with
by sinsay 2012-04-25 for Article: Tokay Gecko CareThanks for good work.
Rated with
by jgrigs711 2012-04-25 for Article: Insanity Workout ReviewRated with
by tbgseo 2012-04-23 for Article: Gold Coast RemovalistsA very good article; well-written and very detailed.
Rated with
by ronbarnas 2012-04-23 for Article: Achieving a Healthier Lifestyle with ViSalusExcellent job! Thanks 5 stars here for sure!
Rated with
by ronin47 2012-04-23 for Article: ETS 52cc Long Reach Multitool Hedgetrimmer 5 in 1 Garden Power ToolWell laid out and good sensible article
Rated with
by ronin47 2012-04-23 for Article: New Trueshopping Petrol Long Reach Multi Function 5 In 1 GardenGood article, exactly as requested
Rated with
by stenostar 2012-04-22 for Article: MI40 Reviewno machted what I mean
Rated with
by bhjmom 2012-04-22 for Article: Why Search Engine Optimization is ImportantToo general and not enough information on what SEO actually is (not just about choosing keywords).
Rated with
by jgrigs711 2012-04-21Rated with
by tanyacarrington67 2012-04-15article not good enough and most does not make any sense not written in native english
Responded with comment: Left negative rating for no real reason saying it didn't make sense, when every other requester seems to be happy with my work. STAY AWAY from this person, they'll reject for no reason.
Rated with
by AdamMack 2012-04-12Great writer. Does not use spun content. Recommend to use.
Rated with
by Helena 2012-04-12I received several similar articles. It looks like copied from somewhere and rewrittem with only minor changes to pass copyspace. Not what I need, sorry.
Responded with comment: Article was not copied, and was original. Very disappointed as it would not have passed Copyspace if it was copied.
Rated with
by Helena 2012-04-12Rated with
by Helena 2012-04-12Rated with
by Helena 2012-04-12Well done. Nicely written.
Rated with
by bigkongz 2012-04-12Rated with
by marcf42 2012-04-12Article is a nice interesting read with very few spelling / grammer / punctuation mistakes.
Rated with
by ronbarnas 2012-04-11thanks
Rated with
by kerdosmkt 2012-04-11Thanks!
Rated with
by n.weston1 2012-04-11Good job
Rated with
by n.weston1 2012-04-11Rated with
by n.weston1 2012-04-11Good job
Rated with
by n.weston1 2012-04-11Go to page: 1, 2
