Ratings for writer contentexpert

Real name
Username
contentexpert experts
contentexpert
This account has been discontinued
Overall rating

Rated with 
  by erwincan 2012-07-06 for Article:
 

Rated with 
  by cray10 2012-07-03 for Article: Features and uses of the LA47532
We've already retained a writer. 

Rated with 
  by cray10 2012-07-03 for Article: What you can Achieve with the MT9P031I12STC Imaging Component
 

Rated with 
  by turkon 2012-07-03 for Article: Debt Consolidation Loans for Bad Credit
Thank you.Good article. 

Rated with 
  by wwwoffers 2012-06-26 for Article: Reasons for investing in security camera systems
A good standard article, thanks. 

Rated with 
  by shineybubbles 2012-06-20 for Article:
Unfortunately missing the asus keywords 

Rated with 
  by goldrushg 2012-05-31 for Article:
Word padding; redundancy of words to achieve word count diminishes useful content. Not something I would publish as is. 

Rated with 
  by jasonp 2012-05-31 for Article:
 

Rated with 
  by littletanhouse 2012-05-31 for Article:
not well written. gives the feeling that the writer has randomly copied and pasted material available on different sites without understanding the concepts involved and has only restructured that material a little bit. 

Rated with 
  by mtitania 2012-05-31 for Article:
it seems to be super amateur, not professional. There are typos, and the sentence structure just isn't that great. It would take lots of editing to get this into usable condition for our needs. I don't think you looked at the referenced articles. 

Rated with 
  by gr8bekah 2012-05-30
 

Rated with 
  by londamedia 2012-05-29
 

Rated with 
  by chidi11 2012-05-25
good article 

Rated with 
  by beatit 2012-05-25
sorry, better read the rules again. 

Rated with 
  by RingMaster 2012-05-25
there was no keyword in the first sentence and there are some gramatical errors which ofcourse I will correct. thanks anyway! 

Rated with 
  by nickbielawski 2012-05-24
 

Rated with 
  by thenoblehaus 2012-05-24
poorly structured sentences doesn't read well 

Rated with 
  by jdtate51 2012-05-24
 

Rated with 
  by teamturner 2012-05-24
Good article. 

Rated with 
  by NatashaTEAM 2012-05-23
 

Rated with 
  by hitreturn 2012-05-23
 

Rated with 
  by JMFieldMarketing 2012-05-22
Grammar not great-a lot of editing required. Did not meet required word count (keywords listed at the top cannot be counted in the 300 words).  

Rated with 
  by ondemandmg 2012-05-22
good 

Rated with 
  by SteveM 2012-05-22
Horrible article, looks like spun version. 

Rated with 
  by teamturner 2012-05-22
Good article 

Show per page: 10 25 50
Go to page: 1, 2, 3, 4
 

Copyright 2011-2014 iWriter.com