Ratings for writer EutychusW
 |
Real name Username |
EutychusW |
This account has been discontinued |
|
| Overall rating |  | |||
Rated with
by schmip 2012-04-03 for Article: Thank You!
Rated with
by evolutionvisions 2012-04-03 for Article: Rated with
by clickforseo 2012-04-03 for Article: well written and researched
Rated with
by youngcow 2012-04-03 for Article: Not focused enough on Log Cabins.
Rated with
by sergeyt 2012-03-30 for Article: Thanks! Good article!
Rated with
by mikeyred 2012-03-30 for Article: Honestly, I just personally don't like it.
Rated with
by andrew777 2012-03-29 for Article: thanks
Rated with
by schmip 2012-03-28 for Article: Thank You!
Rated with
by MattWatson 2012-03-28 for Article: Thanks
Rated with
by mauii77 2012-03-27 for Article: Spelling errors, awkward sentence structure, little factual information.
Rated with
by jackheape 2012-03-27Poor english and grammar. Article was obviously cut and paste or spun material.
Rated with
by mervarid 2012-03-27Rated with
by wealthsavvy 2012-03-23Some grammatical problems and mistakes, but overall did a pretty good job with a tough niche to write on.
Rated with
by osahon 2012-03-23No Flow, a bit repetitive
Rated with
by alex58 2012-03-22Rated with
by tempsmort 2012-03-21Rated with
by jdreesen 2012-03-20Rated with
by dkelso 2012-03-20need some edits, but good content overall, thank you!
Rated with
by jannstill 2012-03-20Rated with
by asanders28 2012-03-20Good Job
Rated with
by limbovision 2012-03-20Rated with
by devcourt 2012-03-20Rated with
by silhounet 2012-03-20Article is irrelevant to the keywords
Rated with
by tamara 2012-03-20Rated with
by elixirwebsolutions 2012-03-20Rated with
by davezig 2012-03-20Rated with
by mlendl 2012-03-19Horrible English.
Did not follow instruction and does not appear to have referred to the example article when writing this article.
Did not follow instruction and does not appear to have referred to the example article when writing this article.
Rated with
by andrew777 2012-03-19Thanks
Rated with
by fooman 2012-03-18Writer has not read my instructions. There was a clear topic which he missed completely.
Rated with
by scott412 2012-03-18This writer did a good enough job that with some minor touch ups the article can be published.
Rated with
by hongrosaonline 2012-03-01good article
Rated with
by chasethemoon 2012-02-29Thank you. Good!
Rated with
by mahaboyd 2012-02-29Rated with
by rodrigopinto 2012-02-27good
Rated with
by geetap 2012-02-26Rated with
by cgeeyc88 2012-02-25cool writing.
Rated with
by kashem 2012-02-23Rated with
by kashem 2012-02-23Rated with
by max1mum 2012-02-22good
Rated with
by paul empey 2012-02-22everyones articles on this subject are becoming repititious and it was not technical enough
Rated with
by zedek777 2012-02-21Thankyou for the superb article
Rated with
by midas25 2012-02-21good
Rated with
by Royalhair 2012-02-21Rated with
by jsladream 2012-02-14thank you
Rated with
by groovyonlineinc 2012-02-05Rated with
by usville 2012-01-19Dont like the article
Rated with
by usville 2012-01-18Wrong information about our product
Rated with
by ct2272 2012-01-16Excellent work, 5 stars
Rated with
by turkon 2012-01-16Thank you.
Rated with
by davidsahel 2012-01-16Go to page: 1, 2
