Ratings for writer Kang Vici
 |
Real name Username |
Kang Vici Vicidi |
Would you like to ask this writer a question?  |
Would you like to have your article written by this writer?  |
| Overall rating |  | |||
| I strive my best to provide you with good articles. | ||||
Rated with
by Cristina_Cantu 2012-08-18Another good article. Thanks so much. Some of the grammar is a little bit incorrect, though. Overall, content is good.
Rated with
by namster 2012-08-17Rated with
by rsras36 2012-08-16good rewrite.
Rated with
by steve.stretton 2012-08-16that is so good I am literally smirking to myself
Rated with
by steve.stretton 2012-08-16Rated with
by Cristina_Cantu 2012-08-16Thank you for a good article. Clear, concise, and keeps the reader and the benefits they are to receive as a priority, which is where they should be.
Rated with
by Cristina_Cantu 2012-08-16I walked away from the article with a clear benefit that I would receive from the product, which is important. I appreciate you keeping the customer in mind and not just rattling off a long list of specs.
Rated with
by tylerherman 2012-08-14Rated with
by Specialed 2012-08-14Rated with
by Specialed 2012-08-13Rated with
by namster 2012-08-13Thanks again!
Rated with
by Specialed 2012-08-12Rated with
by steve.stretton 2012-08-11Rated with
by khoa.jackie 2012-08-10Good writing but there are incorrect research info.
Rated with
by JasonD 2012-08-09Great, thanks!
Rated with
by sergeru 2012-08-09Rated with
by namster 2012-08-08Thank you!
Rated with
by miracure 2012-08-08thanks
Rated with
by namster 2012-08-07Thank you, that was a well written article.
Rated with
by namster 2012-08-07Thank you, this is a very useful article!
Rated with
by namster 2012-08-06Thank you.
Rated with
by namster 2012-08-06Thank you.
Rated with
by namster 2012-08-06Very well written! Thank you.
Rated with
by namster 2012-08-05Thank you.
Rated with
by namster 2012-08-05Thank you, just what I was looking for in this article!
