Rated with
by
ThreadsNLaces 2012-07-04 for
Article:
Positive Things That People Forget When They Are Feeling Down And Out
Thanks for this.
Rated with
by
4sprung 2012-07-03 for
Article:
Fish Oil Tablets: A Simple Way of Attaining a Healthy Body
Rated with
by
focusdesigner 2012-07-02 for
Article:
Classica Wordpress Theme Review
Again it goes into detail that is completely irrelevant to the thing that is supposed to be reviewed and adding in statistics about how many people use the internet etc this just isn't what I am looking for, sorry.
Rated with
by
focusdesigner 2012-07-02 for
Article:
Improve Your Website Conversion Rate
Sorry but I do not understand how you were able to write this article as one was already written for me weeks ago to which I accepted.
Rated with
by
stevenraj 2012-07-02 for
Article:
A Sample of London Escort Service
could be much better...some grammar errors too!
Rated with
by
jecinta01 2012-07-02 for
Article:
Rated with
by
jecinta01 2012-07-02 for
Article:
Rated with
by
jecinta01 2012-07-02 for
Article:
Rated with
by
jecinta01 2012-07-02 for
Article:
Rated with
by
jecinta01 2012-07-02 for
Article:
Sorry but going to have to reject, it is well written but contains to many repeats of the same words, just contains lists and doesn't really go into enough depth.
Very well written for the intent and purpose of the article.
I have asked some changes by email, the article will be accepted once theses will added.
Thanks
the article doesn't have press release language and structure, sorry
grammar issues
Rated with
by
selcor 2012-06-25
perhaps this is because you're not familiar with USA medical system... this is "medical billing software", not hospital billing software, so there should be no reference to hospitals
Well done!
In general, quite good! The last paragraph (the summary) should be rewritten and so do last 3 sentences in the 2nd paragraph. If you can do this in timely manner I will accept the article. Thanks!
This seems a bit thrown together. It also contains too many generalities, rather than specifics of the current seo market or the software. Also there are typos and grammatical errors throughout. Not a bad article, just not up to the standards I need.
Rated with
by
chadif 2012-06-24
A bit too much focus on Duxbury but good content.
Good article, well written!
Good article, very detailed and readable. GREAT job.
Good article.
Good SEO article. Thanks
Not quite what I asked for but I will have to make it work. Well written though, Thanks.
Thank you! We'll probably use you again for future projects!