Ratings for writer reedfanuel
 |
Real name Username |
Reed fanuel reedfanuel |
Would you like to ask this writer a question?  |
Would you like to have your article written by this writer?  |
| Overall rating |  | |||
| Am a content and article writer aimed at providing my clients with the best content they desire. Hire my services and do not get disappointed since i offer the best and am keen in meeting deadlines.I have a vast experience in writing articles on an array of topics. Thanks | ||||
Rated with
by iJacky 2012-06-14Thanks!
Rated with
by zkyclear 2012-06-14Rated with
by zkyclear 2012-06-14Not follow my instructions
Rated with
by iJacky 2012-06-13Thanks!
Rated with
by sjmcqueen 2012-06-13Nice article.
Thanks,
Thanks,
Rated with
by iJacky 2012-06-13Thanks!
Rated with
by Palmfanatic 2012-06-13Great article
Rated with
by promcmax 2012-06-13Wow I like this article thanks very much and keep it up
Rated with
by article inc 2012-06-13Thank you for following instructions so well! It's just unfortunate that your English did not make sense in 75% of the article. I don't have time to edit your grammar mistakes and eliminate filler sentences. However, I appreciate your effort.
Rated with
by tylerl 2012-06-12Well written, very informative. Thank you!
Rated with
by chris@jetdm.com 2012-06-12Nice research and great writing. Thanks.
Rated with
by iJacky 2012-06-12Thanks!
Rated with
by article inc 2012-06-12Your article has far too many grammatical errors, but I accepted this article because after rejecting 3 others, your submission actually follows my specific instructions. The layout is cohesive, I just wish your grammar/editing was more professional.
Rated with
by iJacky 2012-06-11Thanks!
Rated with
by trevord92 2012-06-11Reasonably well written. A few typos; grammar will need some tidying but generally OK.
Rated with
by artmarks 2012-06-10Nice :)
Rated with
by bhavanipreet 2012-06-10need the correct phrase "DSL speeds" to appear, but I will make the modifications.
Rated with
by marclaclear 2012-06-10Rated with
by dealsopoly 2012-06-09Great article. Some of the acronyms were off, but it will be easy to correct. Thank you.
Rated with
by article inc 2012-06-07I only approved this because I'm running out of time. The content is good, but the grammar is not. Thanks for the effort though.
Rated with
by sjmcqueen 2012-06-06Nice article.
Thanks
Thanks
Rated with
by benjaminshort 2012-06-06I am torn between 4 and 5 stars, but I am going with 5. The article contains great information, and is formatted in an aesthetically pleasing way. There are several grammar/spelling errors in the article, but these are easy to fix with a quick edit
Rated with
by leeroy1981 2012-06-06Rated with
by leeroy1981 2012-06-05grammar / spelling / sorry
Rated with
by robertsmith 2012-06-04