Ratings for writer logicallygenius

Real name
Username

logicallygenius
This account has been discontinued
Overall rating

Rated with 
  by tylerherman 2012-07-25
lots of spelling and grammatical errors, misuse of some words 

Rated with 
  by rrice2020 2012-07-25
 

Rated with 
  by webular 2012-07-24
 

Rated with 
  by chardee42 2012-07-24
Looks good. Thanks. 

Rated with 
  by cindysimes 2012-07-24
 

Rated with 
  by chardee42 2012-07-22
Pretty good article. 

Rated with 
  by majorian 2012-07-21
Very Good. 

Rated with 
  by achrafha 2012-07-20
looks very well written, and contains 90% of what I asked for
4 stars from me 

Rated with 
  by levanchik 2012-07-20
 

Rated with 
  by drewthershooter 2012-07-17
Misspelled words and word placement.  
Responded with comment: No solid reason for rejection. 

Rated with 
  by mcardenal99 2012-07-17
 

Rated with 
  by Sharabi 2012-07-17
All the articles I've requested on task management are all similar, almost identical. Nothing new. Need a new point of view.  
Responded with comment: This is not a valid reason for rejecting an article. I request the iWriter authorities to ban this requester. I wrote a very good article on Task management, but this requester has rejected it without any solid reason. 

Rated with 
  by supersophia 2012-07-17
Thank you. A nice quick result. 

Rated with 
  by jmk909er 2012-07-16
At least 6 grammatical errors. I think it was written by someone that English was not their first language  
Responded with comment: whatever. 

Rated with 
  by sjrh43 2012-07-16
This reads like the writer has taken an existing articles and spun it. Most of the sentences do not make sense. Please ensure that all articles are well researched and are in perfect, grammatically correct English 
Responded with comment: Check your grammar first, then point at others. Senseless comments. 

Rated with 
  by abuyer 2012-07-16
Nice 

Rated with 
  by jposey 2012-07-15
There were a number of grammatical errors and the use of the wrong words but the overall content was good. 

Rated with 
  by jdtate51 2012-07-15
instructions were not followed 
Responded with comment: no solid reason to reject the article. 

Rated with 
  by NatashaTEAM 2012-07-13
thanks 

Rated with 
  by MrManvsclock 2012-07-12
 

Rated with 
  by cardinalws 2012-07-12
Needs proofreading and improved structure, but on the right track. 

Rated with 
  by mrsztuczkens 2012-07-11
Good job! 

Rated with 
  by JV2pt0 2012-07-10
Made a rather boring subject interesting. Thanks 

Rated with 
  by allpedal 2012-07-10
Very nicely put together. Will be using again. 

Rated with 
  by amykmrw 2012-07-09
 

Show per page: 10 25 50
Go to page: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
 

Copyright 2011-2014 iWriter.com