Rated with
by
Blogertize 2012-08-31 for
Article:
publisher, author, book
Sorry, but this is an editorial feature, not an advertisement for your company.
Rated with
by
neuewavemedia 2012-08-30 for
Article:
nutritionist in london
poor grammar, no punctuation
Rated with
by
adimond 2012-08-30 for
Article:
working capital formula
Nicely written.
Rated with
by
noobsaibot 2012-08-30 for
Article:
Common symptoms of low blood sugar you should watch out
good
Rated with
by
welasak 2012-08-30 for
Article:
burn visceral fat
OK
Rated with
by
informacione 2012-08-29 for
Article:
how do forex robots work?
Rated with
by
chengcheng 2012-08-28 for
Article:
cross-specific training
a significant portion of the article is not about specific training
Rated with
by
elixirwebsolutions 2012-08-24 for
Article:
Baby Accessories for a Beautiful Baby
good
Rated with
by
crmarjunkarthik 2012-08-23 for
Article:
How Profit Agent works
The article is ok.
few grammatical mistakes still
Will need significant rewriting, but parts of the article are okay.
does not use Keyword in the 'space saving' article. Does not meet 400 word minimum. Please edit and resubmit
good article,informative
Rated with
by
bjarne 2012-08-14
very general
Article is good but wrong subject
Rated with
by
ivando 2012-08-11
Bad style.
Thanks
Thanks. very good review
good
poorly written
Not clear and never answered my article purpose!
it does not make sense