Ratings for writer davisrahab
 |
Real name Username |
Davis Achachi davisrahab |
Would you like to ask this writer a question?  |
Would you like to have your article written by this writer?  |
| Overall rating |  | |||
Rated with
by domonique7 2012-06-04 for Article: Social Media Marketing TipsI am not in eCommerce.Article looks as though it was thrown together
Rated with
by tadisaus2 2012-06-04 for Article: Not good grammar.
Responded with comment: thanks for your fast approval.have really seen the mistakes!
Rated with
by jockster 2011-12-18 for Article: creating a websiteDid no read instructions correctly
Rated with
by marketeer 2011-11-01 for Article: Systems regarded as EntitiesThank you for the effort.
However, too many flaws in grammar and orthography, and moreover, you missed the subject 'Systemic Thinking'.
However, too many flaws in grammar and orthography, and moreover, you missed the subject 'Systemic Thinking'.
Rated with
by rogercbryan 2011-10-21 for Article: Executive coaching training You did not use the keyword enough. You talked just about Executive Coaching and not Training. You did not try to sell the reader in anyway.
Rated with
by keerthi 2011-10-21 for Article: News on mobileSorry for rejecting the article. I've clearly mentioned that i need the content for "news on mobile". Instead of talking about news on mobile you wrote all the advantages of technology and mobiles..
Rated with
by kenney9 2011-10-21 for Article: Barter for Non-Profits through trade exchangesAuthor does not understand the role of a Trade Exchange in today's economy.
Rated with
by trutledge 2011-10-20 for Article: Internet and Businesses OnlineResponded with comment: thanks for your approval
Rated with
by ganeshjacharya 2011-10-20 for Article: Website designing using CMSRated with
by success88 2011-09-25 for Article: Software Development planRated with
by yesacpow 2011-09-24Lots of spelling errors, grammar errors and article makes no sense with regards to my topic.
Rated with
by yesacpow 2011-09-24poorly written article. Lots of grammar errors and article makes no sense.
Rated with
by skalamanga 2011-09-23Acceptable
Rated with
by skalamanga 2011-09-23Good Article
Rated with
by iwpaulette 2011-09-23Rated with
by seo2012 2011-09-23grammar mistakes
Rated with
by iwpaulette 2011-09-22Article was delivered on time as requested, a few grammatical and spelling errors were present.. nothing major though, easy edits. Overall work is good.
Rated with
by yesacpow 2011-09-22Good article.
Rated with
by yesacpow 2011-09-22Great article thanks.
Rated with
by garyhamptonmcp 2011-09-21Rated with
by revans 2011-09-21Rated with
by seo2012 2011-09-21Rated with
by JediJoe 2011-09-20Does not flow well
Rated with
by ulfhielm 2011-09-20Rated with
by ulfhielm 2011-09-20Wow, fast response and excellent bang for the buck.
Go to page: 1, 2
