poor grammar
Responded with comment: Should have given the reason for rejection.
Rated with
by
Taylor 2011-10-11
Needs a little re-writing but solid.
It is almost identical to the last article he wrote for me, except it was a different keyword.
Launch not lunch in the text, small errors in sentence structure, but overall very good.
Already rejected this - it's had a few words changed, perhaps, but still has nonsensical sentences.
Poor English, incomplete / illogical sentences. Not relevant to subject.
Great. Just need some editing and it would be an excellent piece. Thanks!
Good article.
Not relevant content
Rated with
by
hits79 2011-10-05
great article, may need to fix some grammer thou
very well written article, well done
Great work! Thank you.
This article is content for a weight loss blog.. this article refers to products that we don't have access to.. which makes it not suitable for our blog.
bad grammar
Well written short article. Thanks.
Fast, concise, I like it
Great, concise, fast
Great, concise article, looking forward to more
Rated with
by
roma64 2011-10-04
I am trying to understand the second paragraph but I just can't for there are a lot of repetitions and it does not make any sense at all. Now, is it "guide lines" or "guidelines"?. Sorry but I would like to know who is actually writing for iWriter!
Rated with
by
SeoLab 2011-10-04
Good job!
Writer did not read my previous comment.
Not as well written as the first one, but I will have to edit a few sentences.