Rated with
by
Lbaker729 2012-02-04 for
Article:
Treatment for carpal tunnel syndrome
Some areas of the article makes no sense to me and I had a hard time reading this article
Rated with
by
Fayz78 2011-11-02 for
Article:
Family games
article is biased towards Xbox - article is on a game price comparison site for all gaming consoles
Rated with
by
dazcan 2011-11-02 for
Article:
Cuisinart DCC-2600 Review
Not a bad job the article has a couple of errors, but overall well done!
Rated with
by
marketeer 2011-11-02 for
Article:
The economic standing of France
Thank you for the effort!
Rated with
by
marketeer 2011-11-02 for
Article:
The currency exchange risks
Thank you!
Rated with
by
ringitinc 2011-11-01 for
Article:
The budget rental car discounts
Rated with
by
obso1337 2011-11-01 for
Article:
The Corsair Dominator RAM
Some slight edits will be needed, but i let you off this time.
Rated with
by
gavenus 2011-10-30 for
Article:
The euro lottery
Acceptable
Rated with
by
miCro81 2011-10-30 for
Article:
A brief history of the New York Knicks
Thanks.
Rated with
by
artturner 2011-10-29 for
Article:
Rogaine Foam
Rated with
by
j8xt3r 2011-10-28
Good article! I do realise the word count was too little to come up with great content but the writer used the length efficiently to bring across the spec of the phone. Thanks
Thank you!
Good
The article didn't discuss ineffective treatments for sleep disorder and doesn't have a paragraph at the end leading into the Sleep Tracks product.
Nice, thanks.
Rated with
by
kr2000 2011-10-27
Good piece!
Nice piece!
Great content.
Writer did not follow instructions of making it in a newsy style.
I'm sorry your article was good but you miss my point that the main purpose here is to has an article that will invite users to read more or check out products
Rated with
by
kemper 2011-10-24
Im sorry this does not quite make it. Your grammar needs a bit of work. Thank you for trying.
Nice work, thank you
Perfect - thank you!
The first sentence is not valid. There are lots of providers. Plus the english is poor.
Rated with
by
ajwyse 2011-10-20
There were instructions to include PLACEHOLDERS <<<text>>> in the copy which was not provided. Also, the grammar was slightly off. You can tell it's not written by an native, English speaker.
Good Article. Thank you.
Good Article. Thank you.
Good Article. Thank you.
Good Article. Thank you.
Good article, thank you.
Good article
thanks for this good to read article :)
Some small grammatical errors, but the content of the article was something I have been looking for. So, this was well worth it.
too many grammatical errors
ok
We would have liked an article that described regulatory compliance in general terms as related to the pharmaceutical industry. What was provided was a summary of regulatory compliance software which will not be useful for our purpose.