Ratings for writer Nacu Adrian

Real name
Username
Nacu Adrian
NacuAdrian
This account has been discontinued
Overall rating

Rated with 
  by Lbaker729 2012-02-04 for Article: Treatment for carpal tunnel syndrome
Some areas of the article makes no sense to me and I had a hard time reading this article 

Rated with 
  by Fayz78 2011-11-02 for Article: Family games
article is biased towards Xbox - article is on a game price comparison site for all gaming consoles 

Rated with 
  by dazcan 2011-11-02 for Article: Cuisinart DCC-2600 Review
Not a bad job the article has a couple of errors, but overall well done! 

Rated with 
  by marketeer 2011-11-02 for Article: The economic standing of France
Thank you for the effort! 

Rated with 
  by marketeer 2011-11-02 for Article: The currency exchange risks
Thank you! 

Rated with 
  by ringitinc 2011-11-01 for Article: The budget rental car discounts
 

Rated with 
  by obso1337 2011-11-01 for Article: The Corsair Dominator RAM
Some slight edits will be needed, but i let you off this time. 

Rated with 
  by gavenus 2011-10-30 for Article: The euro lottery
Acceptable 

Rated with 
  by miCro81 2011-10-30 for Article: A brief history of the New York Knicks
Thanks. 

Rated with 
  by artturner 2011-10-29 for Article: Rogaine Foam
 

Rated with 
  by artturner 2011-10-29
 

Rated with 
  by j8xt3r 2011-10-28
Good article! I do realise the word count was too little to come up with great content but the writer used the length efficiently to bring across the spec of the phone. Thanks 

Rated with 
  by marketeer 2011-10-28
Thank you! 

Rated with 
  by brianhorn 2011-10-27
 

Rated with 
  by anup.chak 2011-10-27
Good  

Rated with 
  by pagerev 2011-10-27
The article didn't discuss ineffective treatments for sleep disorder and doesn't have a paragraph at the end leading into the Sleep Tracks product. 

Rated with 
  by miCro81 2011-10-27
Nice, thanks. 

Rated with 
  by kr2000 2011-10-27
 

Rated with 
  by marketeer 2011-10-27
Good piece! 

Rated with 
  by 1000perday 2011-10-26
 

Rated with 
  by marketeer 2011-10-26
Nice piece! 

Rated with 
  by befitdepot 2011-10-25
Great content.  

Rated with 
  by shafferb1 2011-10-25
Writer did not follow instructions of making it in a newsy style. 

Rated with 
  by jakrapatra 2011-10-24
I'm sorry your article was good but you miss my point that the main purpose here is to has an article that will invite users to read more or check out products 

Rated with 
  by kemper 2011-10-24
Im sorry this does not quite make it. Your grammar needs a bit of work. Thank you for trying. 

Rated with 
  by barrynew 2011-10-22
Nice work, thank you 

Rated with 
  by alunhill 2011-10-21
Perfect - thank you! 

Rated with 
  by jhulott 2011-10-21
The first sentence is not valid. There are lots of providers. Plus the english is poor. 

Rated with 
  by jhulott 2011-10-21
 

Rated with 
  by jhulott 2011-10-21
 

Rated with 
  by ajwyse 2011-10-20
 

Rated with 
  by rudys0407 2011-10-20
 

Rated with 
  by SmartSearch 2011-10-18
There were instructions to include PLACEHOLDERS <<<text>>> in the copy which was not provided. Also, the grammar was slightly off. You can tell it's not written by an native, English speaker. 

Rated with 
  by catmanwagner 2011-10-18
 

Rated with 
  by hawkvt1 2011-10-18
 

Rated with 
  by geotargeted 2011-10-18
 

Rated with 
  by onlinepubSEO 2011-10-16
Good Article. Thank you. 

Rated with 
  by onlinepubSEO 2011-10-16
Good Article. Thank you. 

Rated with 
  by onlinepubSEO 2011-10-16
Good Article. Thank you. 

Rated with 
  by onlinepubSEO 2011-10-16
Good Article. Thank you. 

Rated with 
  by onlinepubSEO 2011-10-15
Good article, thank you. 

Rated with 
  by tschier 2011-10-09
Good article 

Rated with 
  by ilovecyprus 2011-10-09
thanks for this good to read article :) 

Rated with 
  by iphoenix 2011-09-30
 

Rated with 
  by sambigger 2011-09-29
Some small grammatical errors, but the content of the article was something I have been looking for. So, this was well worth it. 

Rated with 
  by fcmedia 2011-09-29
too many grammatical errors 

Rated with 
  by fcmedia 2011-09-29
 

Rated with 
  by paziendali 2011-09-29
ok 

Rated with 
  by rsoltero 2011-09-28
We would have liked an article that described regulatory compliance in general terms as related to the pharmaceutical industry. What was provided was a summary of regulatory compliance software which will not be useful for our purpose. 

Rated with 
  by limadijaya 2011-09-25
 

Show per page: 10 25 50
Go to page: 1, 2
 

Copyright 2011-2013 iWriter.com