Ratings for writer dilipgranny
 |
Real name Username |
Dileep Kumar dilipgranny |
Would you like to ask this writer a question?  |
Would you like to have your article written by this writer?  |
| Overall rating |  | |||
| I am a post graduate in English literature and content writing has been my passion for the last 4 years. I am prepared to face any challenge thrown at me with the best of my ability. | ||||
Rated with
by chanel26 2013-02-03Rated with
by aldous23 2013-02-02more orders to come!
Rated with
by quick1986 2013-02-02VERY THANKS
Rated with
by sunbrite 2013-02-01Thank you..
Rated with
by aldous23 2013-01-31great job! time for the next order.
Rated with
by Sweep103 2013-01-31Rated with
by Psitta 2013-01-28Rated with
by LarryTay 2013-01-28Rated with
by kocasio 2013-01-28This is not a very well written article. The article would require too much rewriting, which defeats the whole purpose of using a site like this...
Responded with comment: Feeling bad.
Rated with
by mayateam 2013-01-28Rated with
by dokuroc 2013-01-28the article is well written and to the point but what i ask is a friendly tone and presonly i feel this article uses to much high languge that is not needed here.
Rated with
by mayateam 2013-01-28Rated with
by rfa9914 2013-01-27Great article,Thanks.
Rated with
by elvinyeo 2013-01-25Rated with
by dmcontact 2013-01-24Thanks
Rated with
by Sweep103 2013-01-24Rated with
by shasad 2013-01-24This is a re-write that you did from an existing great article on the topic but did it poorly. I did not want a rewrite, I needed a fresh article. Men still take keys, wallet etc despite changes in the technology world.
Responded with comment: This requester did not put forward any guidelines for how to go about it. Perhaps, he does not know. At least, I think he does not know what he really wants. I wasted my time.
Rated with
by justphuta 2013-01-24First sentence is very difficult to understand. Multiple gramatical errors.
Listing the points was a good idea, but 14 is a bit too much. Some of them are repeats. I'd rather have less points, but more in depth. Overall ok article. Not what I need.
Listing the points was a good idea, but 14 is a bit too much. Some of them are repeats. I'd rather have less points, but more in depth. Overall ok article. Not what I need.
Rated with
by khaxan 2013-01-23Rated with
by akelly 2013-01-23excellent
Rated with
by nvaffiliate 2013-01-23Rated with
by Gentech 2013-01-23Rated with
by lquist1 2013-01-22Well written article, good use of lists.
Rated with
by sdimas 2013-01-22Great article! Thanks!
Rated with
by weblinx 2013-01-22