Ratings for writer Fgichuhi
 |
Real name Username |
Francis Gichuhi Fgichuhi |
Would you like to ask this writer a question?  |
Would you like to have your article written by this writer?  |
| Overall rating |  | |||
Rated with
by cosmin3 2012-01-23 for Article: road show limoRated with
by isvirtual 2012-01-23 for Article: dresser cambridgeGood work.
Rated with
by kobryant14 2012-01-22 for Article: genital warts treatment in men, genital warts treatmentRated with
by pjepic 2012-01-21 for Article: Calahonda apartmentsnot suitable
Rated with
by tamash25 2012-01-21 for Article: learn what khat plant is; is catha edulis the same as khat plant?; can catha edulis seeds be used in propagation?very good job
very simple as i want
very simple as i want
Rated with
by crasymind 2012-01-20 for Article: Leather Briefcase,Briefcasewell done
Rated with
by dale2764 2012-01-19 for Article: Dog training NYC is a reality.Good Job!
Rated with
by 6bruno6 2012-01-19 for Article: morphy richards kettleRated with
by richguzman 2012-01-18 for Article: luminesce resultsRated with
by tjinhean 2012-01-18 for Article: automated systemsRated with
by katedep 2012-01-16Didn't know the subject and the article didn't make sense-ie "organic coffee is coffee directly bought from the farmers". That is incorrect.
Rated with
by jamesrider1964 2012-01-16thank you for your work
Rated with
by netprospector 2012-01-16Rated with
by ParkerJ 2012-01-15not exactly what I asked for but ok.
Rated with
by jsummer 2012-01-15great article, thanks
Rated with
by Vastidious 2012-01-12Great article!
Rated with
by marjanz 2012-01-12Rated with
by joycel 2012-01-11Grammar and spelling are not very good.
Rated with
by wolfebet 2012-01-11Rated with
by iwilliam 2012-01-10Grammar very poor, did not flow correctly or even make sense at points.
Rated with
by Blogertize 2012-01-10Have to reject only because it's not to the brief. There were no stats as requested.
Rated with
by LeydaPBB 2012-01-10Rated with
by igotlink 2012-01-09Rated with
by BinaryTech 2012-01-09The article is a good attempt to convey the idea of the keyword, however, the English is broken and the choice of words are mixed up. E.g carriers and careers. Too much correction will be needed if the article was accepted. Thanks for the effort.
Rated with
by Victorhin 2012-01-09Thanks for your excellent writing
