Ratings for writer Jkimbro
 |
Real name Username |
Justus Muriithi Jkimbro |
Would you like to ask this writer a question?  |
Would you like to have your article written by this writer?  |
| Overall rating |  | |||
| I am a Bachelor of Art in Economic with over 3 years experience in the Business Field; -Accounting, marketing, finance, financial analysis, drafting financial statements-balance sheet statements of comprehensive income and financial position. -My other areas of interest which I have gained experience through research writing includes business, history, ethics, Political science, Management, History, Sociology, medicine, nursing, marketing and accounting related issues. | ||||
Rated with
by dimanff 2012-03-24Rated with
by ahsan11223 2012-03-24good writer.
Rated with
by annieooi 2012-03-24The 3 related searches were not included:
hodgkin's lymphoma survival rate
hodgkin's lymphoma symptoms nhs
hodgkin's lymphoma symptoms alcohol
Do not split the above phrase.
hodgkin's lymphoma survival rate
hodgkin's lymphoma symptoms nhs
hodgkin's lymphoma symptoms alcohol
Do not split the above phrase.
Rated with
by tuncalisecz 2012-03-23Rated with
by tuncalisecz 2012-03-23Rated with
by fredskalla 2012-03-18Rated with
by onlinepubSEO 2012-03-09Excellent writer. Followed instructions exactly. I hope this writer takes more of the articles that I have posted.
Rated with
by onlinepubSEO 2012-03-09Excellent writer. Followed instructions exactly. I hope this writer takes more of the articles that I have posted.
Rated with
by onlinepubSEO 2012-03-09Excellent writer. Followed instructions exactly. I hope this writer takes more of the articles that I have posted. Thank you!
Rated with
by dennis09 2012-03-08Rated with
by dickocanton 2012-03-08Rated with
by onlinepubSEO 2012-03-07Excellent writer! Highly recommended. I hope this writer takes on more of my writing assignments. The only feedback I have is that you do not need to use the keyword in all of the subtitles, just the article title and only use the keyword 5 times max
Rated with
by joelwong622 2012-03-06maybe next time, thanks
Rated with
by leswilson 2012-03-06Rated with
by joelwong622 2012-03-06Thanks
Rated with
by SEOWill 2012-03-06Lacks qualifications
Rated with
by Talzick 2012-03-06No paragraphs and forgot the keywords at the end - but otherwise good.
Rated with
by szotlr 2012-03-05good job
Rated with
by szotlr 2012-03-05good job
Rated with
by joelwong622 2012-03-05Thanks
Rated with
by joelwong622 2012-03-05Thanks
Rated with
by joricam 2012-02-27insufficient attempt, not enough guidance of the keyword towards seo/information
Rated with
by jeffrey69 2012-01-28poor grammatical construction
Rated with
by jeffrey69 2012-01-28Good tips but poor construction of grammar
Rated with
by nurullah 2012-01-27Rated with
by Allcoast14 2012-01-25ok thx
Rated with
by bstbiz 2012-01-25Great. Thanks
Rated with
by oicgroup 2012-01-25Too many errors and doesn't read very well to use for our blog.
Rated with
by lawrencewbn 2012-01-24usable text
Rated with
by lawrencewbn 2012-01-24usable copy
Rated with
by digitalsolution 2012-01-24No mention of fatburningfurnace plus the article is difficult to read almost as if it was spun.
Rated with
by stevie27 2012-01-23Rated with
by pcftech 2012-01-21Badly written. Sounds spun
Rated with
by David321 2012-01-20Article works
Rated with
by David321 2012-01-20Too many typos that would require too much time to correct.
Rated with
by brapture 2012-01-19Rated with
by reedme 2012-01-18The article was very well researched and written. It was exactly what I needed.
Rated with
by David321 2012-01-18Article works for me.
Rated with
by fruges12 2011-12-19not good enough. first sentence makes no sense
Rated with
by sleyan 2011-12-19Rated with
by jimballard1 2011-12-19You changed a keyword from "treatment" to "treatments"
Responded with comment: thank you
Rated with
by jimballard1 2011-12-19Rated with
by TomPritch 2011-12-17Rated with
by yurika 2011-12-16Rated with
by slvgold 2011-12-15Comment was removed by admin
Rated with
by pepper 2011-12-15very nice thank you
Rated with
by dsericks 2011-12-15Rated with
by ianfluid 2011-12-14Rated with
by jsalter 2011-12-14Well done, only 1-2 grammar errors.
Rated with
by alekseyzulin 2011-11-02The SEO requirements are not met
