Ratings for writer priyas2411
 |
Real name Username |
Priyadarshini Sarkar priyas2411 |
Would you like to ask this writer a question?  |
Would you like to have your article written by this writer?  |
| Overall rating |  | |||
Rated with
by plrplace 2012-06-14A very well written article.
Rated with
by castlewood 2012-06-12Awesome Article! Fast response as well!
Rated with
by neilch 2012-06-12Good Article, followed instructions well.
Rated with
by NatashaTEAM 2012-06-11Rated with
by mayateam 2012-06-08Rated with
by gellnsh 2012-06-05Rated with
by SammyJayJay 2012-06-04Nice article, Thanks a lot.
Rated with
by SammyJayJay 2012-06-03Great article, thanks
Rated with
by excitemedia 2012-05-28Rated with
by SammyJayJay 2012-05-25Good work, thanks
Rated with
by banting65 2012-05-24The author has correctly interpreted the brief.I did spot the odd spelling and typo error though.
Rated with
by guyfromnb 2012-05-19Good work. Easy to read. Flows well.
Rated with
by khoa.jackie 2012-05-11Rated with
by NinyaEvu 2012-05-04Rated with
by englandrm 2012-05-03Rated with
by jwsatman 2012-05-01excellent thank you
Rated with
by watsonovedades 2012-04-29aprroved
Rated with
by montsa007 2012-04-27Excellent!
Rated with
by acuthbertson 2012-04-25Very well written thank you.
Rated with
by loo821ql 2012-04-24Rated with
by loo821ql 2012-04-23Rated with
by mma100 2012-04-16thank you very much
Rated with
by loo821ql 2012-04-13Rated with
by influx87 2012-04-11Not the quality I am after
Rated with
by loo821ql 2012-04-10Rated with
by NatashaTEAM 2012-04-10Rated with
by fated82 2012-04-09Rated with
by bigkongz 2012-04-06Stop spinning content.
I'm paying money for it. Do not cheat.
I'm paying money for it. Do not cheat.
Responded with comment: I didn't use a spinner. The entire content was written by me, manually. There is a huge difference between an article churned by a software and a human and I had written in perfect English. I worked hard. Please don't use my article. Do not cheat.
Rated with
by billurell 2012-04-05Rated with
by loo821ql 2012-03-26Rated with
by loo821ql 2012-03-26Top quality as always.
Rated with
by troder 2012-03-22Rated with
by acpevans 2012-03-19This article is a spun copy of someone else's work. It failed copyscape with a 15% copy rating.
I was very clear in my instructions - I would do my own copyscape check before approval and WOULD NOT ACCEPT SPUN CONTENT.
Very bad...
I was very clear in my instructions - I would do my own copyscape check before approval and WOULD NOT ACCEPT SPUN CONTENT.
Very bad...
Responded with comment: This articles passed plagiarism test on copyscape, grammarly & plagium !!! I have written more than 250 articles on iWriter & you are the first one to say this. I'll keep track to see if you publish my work!
Rated with
by mareta99 2012-03-17Ok, sounds good, thanks
Rated with
by marklareau 2012-03-14Rated with
by tmflex 2012-03-13Great work.
Rated with
by rankoneads 2012-03-11Rated with
by dan_ct 2012-03-11Good job! Supplied an article of 462 words, when only 300 were required. Which, in my case, is not a problem. Article was written in a bit serious manner, although I asked for a friendly tone. However, it was well written. So, I gave 5!
Rated with
by marklareau 2012-03-10Rated with
by kgarrett 2012-03-04Rated with
by loo821ql 2012-02-28Rated with
by joeking 2012-02-27Rated with
by snowball 2012-02-27Rated with
by Chooky007 2012-02-26Thanks for your effort. I can use some of this with re-write. Feedback - Writing is OK only. It's written in boring professional tone not friendly / engaging tone that I requested.
Rated with
by jirvesro 2012-02-26Thanks good work it read very well
Rated with
by loo821ql 2012-02-19Rated with
by jirvesro 2012-02-19The article is very informative,it read well.
Thanks
Thanks
Rated with
by jirvesro 2012-02-19Read very well..Thanks
Rated with
by jirvesro 2012-02-18I like the article it read good.
