The article was okay but it stated that you would give 3 ways to help the hungry but only two was listed. Some of the text about one of the ways could have been shorten. 

 

Thanks! 

Content greatly improves after one rewrite. Great writer 

The article is informative and flows well. 

use of technical language, syntax errors 

not as good as expected 

Very good quality. 

Perfect thank you! 

 

This article is again poorly written. I would like to see a different style of writer, preferably one with better knowledge of the sport. 

This article is again poorly written. I would like to see a different style of writer, preferably one with better knowledge of the sport. 

 

very happy with article 

Awesome article, provided everything that I asked. The writer gave some real value in the article which is worth teaching to anyone in the niche. Thanks. 

Style too technical and overall too broad a scope. 

Thank you this is exactly what i wanted. 

 

don't do according to our requirements. 

 

 

 

 

good work 

 

Good, well written article, pleased with the content overall and very quick turnaround. 

not what I am looking for 

 

I was expecting something else 

Good work. Thanks! 

 

 

I will need to do some tweaking but it is basically a good article. 

omg... i was reading through, first part of the article i was like this is good, not bad. Then the end just blew me out of the water. outstanding. This is exactly what i am looking for. you followed instructions perfectly. added to favs 

not about what it needed to be about. not a general about the show, needed to be about the specific place/building/location 

great article 

It's not work for my blog. I'm sorry :( 

Good. Thanks 

thank you, love the content! 

good 

Good. Thanks! 

Good. Thanks! 

awesome, thank you! 

 

Sorry, I need a higher quality article. Too many grammar errors and portions of the article did not make any sense. 

 

thanks, more coming every week!