Ratings for writer JoshOrtiz
 |
Real name Username |
josh ortiz JoshOrtiz |
Would you like to ask this writer a question?  |
Would you like to have your article written by this writer?  |
| Overall rating |  | |||
| Cannot show writer bio. It may contain contact info... | ||||
Rated with
by eforestal55 2013-03-10not what I am looking for
Rated with
by gossmann 2013-03-10Rated with
by darius13 2013-03-10I was expecting something else
Rated with
by juman29 2013-03-09Good work. Thanks!
Rated with
by rhudkins 2013-03-09Rated with
by vicb01 2013-03-09Rated with
by svornholt 2013-03-09I will need to do some tweaking but it is basically a good article.
Rated with
by ClockWork 2013-03-08omg... i was reading through, first part of the article i was like this is good, not bad. Then the end just blew me out of the water. outstanding. This is exactly what i am looking for. you followed instructions perfectly. added to favs
Rated with
by robbymorton 2013-03-08not about what it needed to be about. not a general about the show, needed to be about the specific place/building/location
Rated with
by eforestal55 2013-03-08great article
Rated with
by MrJohnnieWalker 2013-03-08It's not work for my blog. I'm sorry :(
Rated with
by astonrelief 2013-03-08Good. Thanks
Rated with
by emcnabb 2013-03-07thank you, love the content!
Rated with
by astonrelief 2013-03-07good
Rated with
by astonrelief 2013-03-07Good. Thanks!
Rated with
by astonrelief 2013-03-07Good. Thanks!
Rated with
by emcnabb 2013-03-07awesome, thank you!
Rated with
by thebqb 2013-03-07Rated with
by netmediapros 2013-03-07Sorry, I need a higher quality article. Too many grammar errors and portions of the article did not make any sense.
Rated with
by tayers@opm.us.com 2013-03-07Rated with
by vivalareggie 2013-03-07thanks, more coming every week!
Rated with
by tayers@opm.us.com 2013-03-07Rated with
by cxguldi 2013-03-07Rated with
by andrewxr 2013-03-07Rated with
by hornbeckd 2013-03-06This article is choppy, unorganized, and difficult to follow. Grammar is next to poor, and there are misspellings. I do not trust the content either.
